Thursday, 31 October 2013

Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson's 'secret six year affair exposed

Former News of the World editors Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson were having a secret affair for at least six years, the Old Bailey heard today.
Police investigating phone hacking in 2011 discovered they had been lovers since 1998 after finding a letter Mrs Brooks wrote to Mr Coulson in February 2004 on her PC. 
Their affair was revealed today at the Old Bailey because it took place at the height of hacking at the News of the World, where she was editor and he was her deputy for the majority of that time.
Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson in September 2004
Andy Coulson leaves the Old Bailey with wife Eloise
Revelation: Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson (left, in September 2004) were having a secret affair for at least six years, the Old Bailey heard today. Coulson is pictured leaving the court today with his wife Eloise (right)
Couple: Rebekah Brooks (right) with her husband Charlie Brooks (left) leaving the Old Bailey in London today
Couple: Rebekah Brooks (right) with her husband Charlie Brooks (left) leaving the Old Bailey in London today



Former Chief Executive of News International, Rebekah Brooks arrives at the Old Bailey
Andy Coulson today
Lovers: Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson arrive at London's Old Bailey for the second day of their trial today


Revelations: Rebekah Brooks, former News International chief executive, arrives for the phone-hacking trial today with her husband Charlie Brooks on the day the court heard she had a secret six-year affair with Andy Coulson
Revelations: Rebekah Brooks, former News International chief executive, arrives for the phone-hacking trial today with her husband Charlie Brooks, on the day the court heard she had a secret six-year affair with Andy Coulson
The note on her computer was Brooks' reaction to Coulson's decision to break-off the romance, the court heard, but it is not known if it was ever sent.
'The fact is you are my very best friend, I tell you everything, I confide in you, I seek your advice, I love you, care about you, worry about you, we laugh and cry together,' Ms Brooks wrote.
 
'In fact without our relationship in my life I am not sure I will cope'.
Andy Coulson married his wife Eloise in 2000 and Brooks married Eastenders star Ross Kemp in 2002, when it was claimed they were having an affair with each other.
In court: From left, Ian Edmondson, Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson look at video evidence and take notes
In court: From left, Ian Edmondson, Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson look at video evidence and take notes
Leaving: Downing Street's former director of communications and News Of The World editor Andy Coulson departs the Old Bailey after denying the charges against him at the phone-hacking conspiracy trial
Leaving: Downing Street's former director of communications and News Of The World editor Andy Coulson departs the Old Bailey after denying the charges against him at the phone-hacking conspiracy trial
Making an exit: Andy Coulson (right) departs the Old Bailey in Central London at the end of the day
Making an exit: Andy Coulson (right) departs the Old Bailey in Central London at the end of the day
Famous: Eastenders star Ross Kemp and Rebekah Wade married in 2002 but later divorced in 2009
Famous: Eastenders star Ross Kemp and Rebekah Wade married in 2002 but later divorced in 2009
The prosecution said the fact they were lovers is important because 'in this period what Mrs Brooks knew, Mr Coulson knew, and what Mr Coulson knew, Mrs Brooks knew', Andrew Edis QC said.'

THE LETTER BROOKS WROTE TO COULSON 'AT END OF AFFAIR'

Rebekah Brooks
A letter from Brooks to Coulson in February 2004 was discovered by police.
Its final paragraphs were read to the Old Bailey today.
‘Finally and the least of our worries, but how do we really work this new relationship? There are a hundred things that have happened since Saturday night that I would normally share with you..some important, most trivial,' she wrote.
‘The fact is you are my very best friend. I tell you everything, I confide in you, I seek your advice, I love you, care about you, worry about you. We laugh and cry together... in fact without our relationship in my life, I am really not sure how I will cope.
‘I'm frightened to be without you... but bearing in mind 'the rules' you will not know how I am doing and visa versa. The thought of finding out anything about you or your life from someone else fills me with absolute dread.
‘Also you said I had to email you if anything important happened… like if I was ill? I don't understand this... we are either there for each other or not surely?
‘But for example, how does this work thing manifest itself. Do we limit contact until we absolutely have to... like leaving our execs to sort run of the mill joint stuff?
‘I don't want to get this wrong. I hope that I've managed to put your mind at rest about Les..and that you two now have a better relationship. On KRM (Keith Rupert Murdoch), well he's not b********g you must not brood on lack of calls.
‘Obviously I can't discuss my worries, concerns, problems at work with you anymore... and visa versa... but I'll assume unless I hear different that we keep our professional relationship to the minimum... and avoid if possible without it being in any way awkward.
‘If it is necessary or more importantly right that we two editors should deal with it, then we will.
‘If either of us feels that we are not striking this balance then we must say...?? Anyway, that really isn't where I am confused. I know what horror it means and I know why we have to stick to it.’
'The point that I'm going to make in relation to that letter is that over the relevant period, what Mr Coulson knew, Mrs Brooks knew too. And what Mrs Brooks knew, Mr Coulson knew too - that's the point,' he went on.
'Because it is clear from that letter that, as of February 2004, they had been having an affair which had lasted at least six years'.
Mr Edis told the court that the pair had been having an affair dating back to around 1998, spanning the period covered by their phone-hacking conspiracy charge.
The court heard that the letter - apparently written by Brooks in response to Coulson trying to end the affair - included a declaration of her love for her colleague.
Mr Edis told jurors he was not revealing the affair to deliberately intrude into their privacy or to make a 'moral judgment'.

The final part of the letter was read to the jury to illustrate just how close Coulson and Brooks had been during their affair.
'There are a hundred things which have happened since Saturday night that I would normally share with you, some are important, most trivial', she wrote.
'The fact is that you are my very best friend, I tell you everything, I confide in you, I seek your advice, I love you, care about you and worry about you.
'Without our relationship in my life, I really don't think I will cope.
'I am fortunate to be with you, but bearing in mind the rules, you will not know how I am doing and vis a vis.'
She wrote that finding out about Coulson's life 'fills me with absolute dread'
Referring to rules of their future relationship Coulson has set out, she wrote: 'Email if there is anything important happens - I don't understand this, we are either there for each other or we are not.
'How will this work for you and manifest itself. Do we limit contact until we absolutely have to?'
She added: 'Obviously I can't discuss my worries, concerns, problems at work with you anymore or vis a vis.
'I assume until I hear otherwise we will keep our professional relationship at a minimum and avoid if possible without being awkward.'
Mr Edis said this shows the close nature of their relationship before the break up, proving Coulson and Brooks must have shared information about phone hacking if one of the other knew about it.
Event: Rebekah Brooks, Charlie Brooks, with Andy Coulson and his wife Eloise at Mayfair cabaret in 2009
Event: Rebekah Brooks, Charlie Brooks, with Andy Coulson and his wife Eloise at Mayfair cabaret in 2009
Evidence: The prosecution presented a letter from February 2004, apparently written after their romance ended, just months before this photo was taken in September that year
Evidence: The prosecution presented a letter from February 2004, apparently written after their romance ended, just months before this photo was taken in September that year
Evidence: The prosecution presented a letter from February 2004, apparently written after their romance ended, just months before this photo was taken in September that year, left, and right in 2007


'Mrs Brooks and Mr Coulson are charged with conspiracy, and when people are charged with conspiracy the first question the jury have to answer is how well did they know each other.
'How much did they trust each other? If they were in this relationship, it mean they trusted each other quite a lot'.
Brooks remained with her head bowed and Coulson looked ahead towards the prosecutor as their affair was revealed to the jury.
The court heard that Brooks went on holiday to Dubai in April 2002, but remained in contact with Coulson while she was away.
Colleagues: Andy Coulson and Rebekah Wade pictured together in 2008 at the Tory party conference, after their alleged affair was over
Colleagues: Andy Coulson and Rebekah Wade pictured together in 2008 at the Tory party conference, after their alleged affair was over
Packed courtroom: Defendants in the dock at London's Old Bailey listening to a recording of Glenn Mulcaire
Packed courtroom: Defendants in the dock at London's Old Bailey listening to a recording of Glenn Mulcaire
Mr Edis said: 'That's why you need to have the full context of their relationship - because while she was away she was in contact with him, we say.
'Of course, what I've told you may mean that they had all sorts of personal reasons for wanting to remain in contact with each other, but we say to you that it's clear from the timing of the contact that it was at least partly work-related.'
The court also heard that Brooks told Eimear Cook, former wife of golfer Colin Montgomerie, that phone hacking was rife in the newspaper industry.
'She said all you needed was a person's mobile phone number and a factory pin and you could listen to their voicemail, and actually gave an example of a story involving Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills,' Mr Edis told the jury.
He said there was indeed evidence that Sir Paul and his then wife had been targets of phone hacking by Mulcaire.
This led to a story in the NotW in June 2002 with the headline Macca Throws Heather's Ring Out Of Hotel Window, he claimed. The defendants deny the charges and the trial continues.

In detail: Barrister Andrew Edis QC opens the case for the prosecution at the court in Central London
In detail: Barrister Andrew Edis QC opens the case for the prosecution at the court in Central London
Husband: Ms Brooks is in the dock with partner Charlie Brooks, who is accused of perverting the course of justice
Husband: Ms Brooks is in the dock with partner Charlie Brooks, who is accused of perverting the course of justice. They married in 2009
 

How Mulcaire 'hacked into phones of David Blunkett's friends and associates to reveal story of his affair'

Claims: The story of Home Secretary David Blunkett's affair was allegedly the result of Mulcaire hacking into the phones of his friends and associates
Claims: The story of Home Secretary David Blunkett's affair was allegedly the result of Mulcaire hacking into the phones of his friends and associates
Prosecutor Mr Edis said the story of Home Secretary David Blunkett's affair was the result of Mulcaire hacking into the phones of his friends and associates.
'His phone was not hacked, the people who were hacked were people he knew. We have a great many records of voicemails he left for people he knew.
'These voicemails resulted in stories being published, they are all in the public domain already. It was big news at the time. On this occasion Mr Coulson became directly and personally involved.
'He went to see Mr Blunkett to tell him the story was going to be run and discussed it with him.
'Mr Blunkett is a careful man and made a recording of what was said. In it Mr Coulson didn't say how he knew about the story but he did say he was absolutely sure it was right.
'We know it came from phone hacking, tapes that prove it were recovered from the safe of the lawyer at News International.’
The court also heard that the News of the World asked Mulcaire to hack Fire Brigade Union leader Andy Gilchrist after firefighters went on strike.
'In the back end of 2002 the Fire Brigade Union union is in dispute with the government and was announcing strike action,' said Mr Edis.
'Strike action in the emergency services is a highly controversial thing and the News of the World and The Sun both had strong editorial lines on it.
'What occurred was that on November 30, 2002 Mr Gilchrist gave a speech to a group of MPs and guests in Manchester, the day after an eight-day strike.
'There's a press release sent out, Mr Gilchrist is aware of press attention, lots of people were following them around but what is laid at the door of the News of the World is that Mr Mulcaire was tasked to hack Mr Gilchrist's phone.
Dispute: The court heard the News of the World asked Mulcaire to hack Fire Brigade Union leader Andy Gilchrist (pictured) after firefighters went on strike
Dispute: The court heard the News of the World asked Mulcaire to hack Fire Brigade Union leader Andy Gilchrist (pictured) after firefighters went on strike
'There's a page of Mr Mulcaire's notes with the name Greg at the top and Andrews Gilchrist's name and his wife's name.
‘Another page with numbers and phone numbers and reference to a pay number. On December 4, 2002 is a hand-written page containing voicemail scripts from people who know Mr Gilchrist.
‘On December 5 there's another call. The News of the World published articles on December 8 and that's as far as it goes. There was further hacking of Mr Gilchrist in 2002.
‘They didn't find a story they found out his favourite restaurant but that's not much use for a story. So they investigated him to find something to go to his disgrace.'
Mr Edis added: 'We know that on January 13, 2013 Mrs Brooks became editor of The Sun and what happened there is of some interest - what she put in the paper about Mr Gilchrist, what her approach to him was.
'January 20, 2003, The Sun runs an article “Fire strike leader is a love cheat” and “Fire Liar”.
'What had happened is that The Sun had come by a story not by phone hacking but by other means which they had paid a lot of money, for which revealed that years earlier Mr Gilchrist had an affair with another female member of the fire brigade and this is what they did with that discovery.
'That demonstrates her (Brook's) agenda about him and that may show more clearly that she was behind the tasking of Mr Mulcaire. By now the phone hacking has been going on for quite a long time.
'She must have been involved in the payments because they are so large, she must have been involved in the Milly Dowler story because of the phone contact while on holiday.
'And then the tasking about something we know she's very interested in - find out something about Mr Gilchrist because if we find it I know how we can use it.'
 

News of the World sent team to hunt for schoolgirl Milly Dowler after listening to her voicemails, Old Bailey hears

Victim: The Old Bailey heard that Brooks and Coulson would have known about the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone
Victim: The Old Bailey heard that Brooks and Coulson would have known about the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone
A team of reporters and photographer were dispatched to hunt for Milly Dowler based on information from the schoolgirl's hacked voicemails, the court heard.
Mulcaire had listened to the messages at the behest of chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, hearing that a recruitment firm in Telford had rung Miss Dowler.
The tabloid then dispatched its employees to Telford to work on this information, before telling the police what they had learned.
Kuttner and Thurlbeck both then informed Surrey Police that the paper had listen to her private messages, with Thurlbeck pretending they had got hold of them through Miss Dowler's schoolfriends.
Mr Edis told the court: 'They dispatched a team of journalists and photographers to Telford so they could see whether Milly Dowler could be found in Telford.
'They wanted to speak to the recruitment agency to see whether she was at the factory that the telephone had concerned, to see whether they could find Milly Dowler alive.
'If they had done - they didn't, Milly Dowler was of course dead - it would have been quite a story: The News of the World finds the girl that police can't find.
'They committed considerable resources to it, sending a team of people to Telford.'
The court heard the recruitment firm fell foul of a hoax caller pretending to be Milly Dowler, and the lead from the voicemail was not true.
However, Mr Edis said the activity leading up to and the story eventually published based on this information show senior people at the paper were deeply involved.
Glenn Mulcaire has pleaded guilty to phone hacking, it emerged today
Chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck
Murder case: Private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, left, who has admitted intercepting voicemails, was asked by former NotW chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck to listen to Milly's voicemails


Stuart Kuttner had written to the police earlier in the week asking a series of questions about Miss Dowler's disappearance, offering to help in anyway they could.
After the voicemail emerged, Kuttner tried to contact the police on the Saturday before publication with news from the voicemails, promising 'significant information'.
Brooks was on holiday at the time in Dubai, but made a string of phone calls to the news desk with one lasting 38 minutes, the court heard.
Dowler case: Stuart Kuttner rang Surrey Police to promise 'significant information' about the missing schoolgirl based on a hacked voicemail, jury told
Dowler case: Stuart Kuttner tried to contact Surrey Police to promise 'significant information' about the missing schoolgirl based on a hacked voicemail, jury told

Mr Edis said it was likely that Brooks was speaking to Coulson, acting as editor in those calls, and because they were having an affair, it was likely they were sharing information.
'If they weren't talking about work, and weren't exchanging confidences and discussing difficulties, the point of the letter was to show what Coulson knew as editor, Mrs Brooks knew too, because of the kind of relationship they had.'
He continued: 'She met somebody in Dubai while on holiday who remembers that she spent a lot of time on the phone during her holiday.
'On one occasion, she said I've got to go and speak to somebody about the missing Surrey schoolgirl.
'If you accept that evidence, it shows she was interested in the story and shows you something about the phone contact.
'At the time of the 38 minute phone call, while this was going on between Mrs Brooks and the editor's desk at the News of the World, things were hotting up.
'The News of the World was on the hunt for a substantial story.
'Did the editors know, and if they knew they must have known where it comes from - it had come from a phone hacker.'
Mr Edis said the first edition of the paper went to press which included direct quotes from the voicemail message that had been hacked.
The second edition was amended to remove the quotes, and Mr Edis said Brooks spoke to the news desk before each edition went to press.
'It is simply incredible that the editors did not know what was going on in that week', he said.
'There was just too much going on.'
 

Hacking trial jurors hear recording of £100,000-a-year News of the World investigator 'blagging' O2 operator

Evidence: Glenn Mulcaire has pleaded guilty to phone hacking and the jury heard examples of his blagging in court today
Evidence: Glenn Mulcaire has pleaded guilty to phone hacking and the jury heard examples of his blagging in court today
Jurors in the trial of former News of the World editors Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson today heard a recording of the tabloid's £100,000-a-year 'blagger' getting a voicemail password reset by a mobile phone company.
In the brief recording Glenn Mulcaire, who has already pleaded guilty to charges of phone hacking, contacts O2 to ask for a voicemail reset - a method it is alleged could be used to access people's messages.
Brooks and her number two Andy Coulson have been accused of being at the heart of the hacking conspiracy because they 'held the purse strings' at the News of the World, the jury heard.
Prosecutor Andrew Edis QC told the court today: 'He (Mulcaire) gives the woman who works for the company a network password, albatross, which he has got from somewhere.

'He really knows how it works, he knows the right things to say, and he is quite chatty and she doesn't seem at all troubled.'
Continuing his case opening, which started yesterday at the Old Bailey, Mr Edis said other than a few 'taskings' by the News of the World in 1999, the first dated tasking of Mulcaire by the newspaper was January 8, 2001
Yesterday the Old Bailey heard Rebekah Brooks presided over a six-year campaign of phone hacking which targeted politicians, pop stars and royals.
The former News of the World editor and her then deputy Andy Coulson allegedly sanctioned ‘thousands upon thousands’ of voicemail interceptions.
The court heard that illegal phone tapping was so widespread that lieutenants at the now-defunct tabloid even used a special hotline for ‘do-it-yourself hacking’ and targeted rival journalists.
It was also revealed for the first time that three former news editors at the newspaper, Neville Thurlbeck, 52, Greg Miskiw, 63, and James Weatherup, 57, have all pleaded guilty to their part in the hacking plot.
In a ‘pervasive’ phone hacking culture at the paper, the voicemails of members of the Royal Family were intercepted, including Lord Frederick Windsor, son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent.
Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, former private secretary to Princes William and Harry, was also targeted.
Celebrities who were hacked include Sir Paul McCartney and his then wife Heather Mills, as well as actor Jude Law and his girlfriend at the time, Sienna Miller.
Prosecution opening: Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson watch Andrew Edis QC tell the jury yesterday that the pair knew about phone hacking because they 'held the purse strings' at the News of the World
Prosecution opening: Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson watch Andrew Edis QC tell the jury yesterday that the pair knew about phone hacking because they 'held the purse strings' at the News of the World

First day: From left, Ian Edmondson, Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson, Clive Goodman, Cheryl Carter, Charlie Brooks and Mark Hanna listen to the prosecution's opening yesterday afternoon
First day: From left, Ian Edmondson, Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson, Clive Goodman, Cheryl Carter, Charlie Brooks and Mark Hanna listen to the prosecution's opening yesterday afternoon

Ian Edmondson
Clive Goodman
Defendants: Former news editor at the News of the World Ian Edmondson (top left), former royal editor Clive Goodman (top right), Brooks's PA Cheryl Carter (bottom left) and managing editor Stuart Kuttner (bottom right)

Cheryl Carter
Stuart Kuttner


Yesterday it emerged for the first time that associates of model Kate Moss, singer Will Young and actress Joanna Lumley were targeted too.
Glenn Mulcaire, the newspaper’s phone hacking specialist, also recorded voicemail messages belonging to the former home secretary David Blunkett and the British nanny Louise Woodward, who was convicted of killing a child in the US in the 1990s.
Mulcaire, 43, who was paid £100,000 a year by the paper to lead the hacking, has also admitted intercepting the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s voicemails.
In an earlier hearing, he admitted three counts of conspiracy to commit phone hacking after police found ‘thousands of thousands of pages’ of notes relating to his victims.
Prosecutor Andrew Edis, QC, said:‘They were responsible for enormous payments made to Mr Mulcaire. They were party to a conspiracy to ensure that was carried out.’
He told the jury they had to decide ‘quite a simple issue: there was phone hacking – who knew?’ 
He went on: ‘The News of the World was a Sunday paper, that means it was published once a week.
‘It wasn’t War and Peace, it wasn’t an enormous document – it was the sort of document, that if editing, you could actually take an interest in the contents without too much trouble.
'The management must have known where some of these stories had come from'.
Former News of the World journalist James Weatherup
Greg Miskiw, former news editor of the News of the World,
Guilty: Former News of the World journalist James Weatherup (left) and his news editor Greg Miskiw (right) have also been accused of breaking the law by intercepting voicemails, the Old Bailey heard



Allegations: Mark Hanna, the former head of security at News International, is accused of conspiring with Mrs Brooks and her husband Charlie to pervert the course of justice
Allegations: Mark Hanna, the former head of security at News International, is accused of conspiring with Mrs Brooks and her husband Charlie to pervert the course of justice
And today Mr Edis said Mulcaire's contract would also have been known about by management.
'It was not hidden from anybody that he was being paid all that money because of course the money has to go through an accounting system, it is budgeted for, it's seen.
'The question is, didn't anybody ever ask, what are we paying this chap for?'
He added: 'So what was it that he was doing? Well, we know that he was a phone hacker and we know that he was a good one, and we know that he was an accomplished blagger.'
Brooks and Coulson are accused of conspiracy to intercept voicemail communications with former head of news Ian Edmondson, 44, and ex-managing editor Stuart Kuttner, 73, between October 2000 and August 2006.
Brooks is also charged with two counts of conspiring with others to commit misconduct in public office. She faces two allegations of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice – one with former PA, Carter.
The second count alleges that Brooks, her husband Charlie and former head of security Hanna conspired together with others to pervert the course of justice by trying to conceal documents, computers and electronic equipment from police.
Coulson and Goodman are accused of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office by paying for a Royal household phone directory. All eight deny the charges.
 

Revealed: The Three emails to News of the World staffer that sparked Scotland Yard hacking probe

Accusation: The court heard about three emails to former news editor of the News of the World Ian Edmondson, about the hacking of phones linked to Tessa Jowell, Lord Frederick Windsor, and an adviser to John Prescott
Accusation: The court heard about three emails to former news editor of the News of the World Ian Edmondson, about the hacking of phones linked to Tessa Jowell, Lord Frederick Windsor, and an adviser to John Prescott

The court heard that the police investigation into phone hacking in 2011 was sparked by the discovery of three emails that News International gave to officers.
The messages were from Glenn Mulcaire to news editor Ian Edmondson, and it is alleged they were about hacking phones linked to Tessa Jowell and David Mills; Lord Frederick Windsor, son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent; and an adviser to John Prescott.
The first message, on April 20 2006, referred to Jowell and Mills, at a time when Mills had been accused of involvement in bribery linked to former Italian leader Silvio Berlusconi.
It said: 'Substantial traffic both ways, also looks like she's selling up.'
Mr Edis told the jury: 'You're going to have to decide in Mr Edmondson's case what you make of that, whether it can possibly mean anything at all other that 'I've been phone-hacking Tessa, and this is what I've found out'.'
Another message, from April 27 2006, referred to Lord Frederick Windsor, and contained a reference to 'press * and Pin', which prosecutors say was Mulcaire telling Edmondson how to hack a phone.
The third email refered to an adviser to former deputy prime minister Lord Prescott, who was at the centre of a publicity storm because he was accused of having an affair.
Target: The hacking trial today heard how phones linked to Tessa Jowell and husband David Mills (pictured) were repeatedly hacked by Mulcaire and management allegedly knew about it
Target: The hacking trial today heard how phones linked to Tessa Jowell and husband David Mills (pictured) were repeatedly hacked by Mulcaire and management allegedly knew about it

Prosecutors claim that Edmondson must have known that Mulcaire was hacking phones.
Referring to the alleged targeting of MP Ms Jowell and her husband Mr Mills, Mr Edis said: 'We know what Mr Mulcaire was doing, he was phone hacking.
'Look how much contact there is at this time between Mr Edmondson and Mr Mulcaire.
Deputy Prime Minister: Records showed that Mulcaire tried to hack phones linked to Lord Prescott to get details about his affair with his secretary in 2006
Deputy Prime Minister: Records showed that Mulcaire tried to hack phones linked to Lord Prescott to get details about his affair with his secretary in 2006
'Do you think it is likely or even possible that Mr Edmondson did not know what was being done by Mr Mulcaire?
'We know that Edmondson was interested in Tessa Jowell, he was investigating Tessa Jowell, and we know that he was in communication with Mr Mulcaire.
'We know that Mr Mulcaire hacked Tessa Jowell's phone and listened to her messages.'
Mr Edis went on: 'This was an important story.
'It wasn't something that was stuck after the letters page, this was big stuff.'
The prosecutor said it was the editor's duty to ask 'How do I know this information is true?' when stories were going to appear in the newspaper.
'Mr Coulson was editor at this time,' he told the jury.
The jury heard that the newspaper went about trying to get a 'scoop' about Lord Prescott's affair with his secretary Tracey Temple in April 2006.

Mr Edis described a series of phone calls, emails, and phone hacks that he said was Mulcaire trying to get information at the behest of the NotW.
The jury also heard that journalists at the paper, including James Weatherup - who has already pleaded guilty to hacking charges - and Coulson, discussed trying to contact Ms Temple to offer her £100,000 for her story.
Records showed that they then tried to hack the phone of Lord Prescott's special adviser Joan Hammell.
The court was told the NotW hacked journalists from rival paper the Mail on Sunday - Dennis Rice and Sebastian Hamilton - to find out what information they had on the story.
'This was all about finding out how the competition were getting on with the story because, of course, you don't want to be scooped,' Mr Edis said.
'One nice easy cheap way of finding out what they know is to hack their phone so that the competition don't get to steal a march on you.
'In the dog eat dog world of journalism, in a frenzy to get this huge story or try to get something better or at least as good as what everyone else has got, that's what you do, perhaps, if you are Ian Edmondson. You hack the competition.'
Mr Edis said that when the News of the World found out the Mail on Sunday was hoping to run the story, the paper concluded: 'We are going to spoil that by doing our own story.
'We know how they were planning to do the spoiler - it was by hacking other journalists.'
 

Prosecution: Payments to private eye Mulcaire 'proves management knew about hacking'

Claims: Andrew Edis QC said today that management like Rebekah Brooks controlled finances so would have known about payments to hacker Mulcaire
Claims: Andrew Edis QC said today that management like Rebekah Brooks controlled finances so would have known about payments to hacker Mulcaire

Prosecution QC Andrew Edis claimed today that budget cuts at the News of the World during the hacking scandal meant that Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson would have known about payments to 'blagger' Glenn Mulcaire.
The Old Bailey also heard that the 'pressure' from the top to find exclusive stories for the Sunday tabloid forced journalists to 'stray into crime'.
Mr Edis told jurors: 'You're going to have to form a view about how much pressure there was on journalists at the NotW to get stories, so that they strayed sometimes into crime in order to do it.
'And also how much the editor was involved in the whole process.'
The newspaper had a successful year in 2004, but management were not happy with the performance in 2005, the court heard.
Jurors were read an email from Kuttner to Miskiw in September 2000, warning him that he was 43% overspent nine weeks into the financial year.
Messages were sent to senior staff in June 2001, saying they would have to get 'formal approval from the editor for spending outside their limits'.
They were warned that there would be 'the most severe consequences' if they exceeded their budgets.
Mr Edis said that Brooks, Kuttner and Coulson were working together to rein in spending.
He said: 'We can see the three of them operating as a management team, trying to keep these groups of journalists within budget.'
Brooks' instructions about controlling spending were reiterated that month, and she wrote to Miskiw and former chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck telling them that any payments over £1,000 would have to be authorised by herself, Kuttner or Coulson.
Mr Edis told the court that Kuttner warned them he would be 'unavoidably tough', saying: 'The palmy days of indulgence are over.'
The prosecutor told the court: 'That's the point which we say generates the inference that they must have known what was going on with Mr Mulcaire.
'What on earth do they think they are doing if they did not know? The money was going out of the paper. Where was it going? Did they care? Well, yes, they did.'
The court heard that in August 2001, when rules about how regular contributors were paid changed, Mulcaire was a 'major exception'.
Mr Edis said: 'If people knew that Mr Mulcaire was committing crimes on behalf of the NotW or engaged in unacceptable activity on behalf of the NotW, then they would quickly understand that he had to be deniable.'
Jurors were told that Kuttner authorised 221 separate payments totalling £413, 527 to Mulcaire 'over the years', amounting to 72 per cent of what Mulcaire earned during that time.
Read More »

Rihanna flies her tattoo artists 1,500 miles to spend 11 hours making her New Zealand tribal art work 'pretty'

Rihanna wanted to add to the tribal hand tattoo she got in New Zealand, so she called up her American ink artists.
Only thing was their New York City shop was 1,500 miles away. Not a problem for the Diamonds singer - she just put them on an airplane to meet her in the Dominican Republic on Sunday, according to PageSix.
The designers said it took them 11 hours to make the traditional marks 'pretty,' no doubt offending the ancient tribes. She showed off the new work during her Puerto Rico concert on Monday.
More ink: While performing in Puerto Rico on Monday, Rihanna showed off her new henna-inspired tattoo on her right hand that covered up most of the traditional art work she got in New Zealand
More ink: While performing in Puerto Rico on Monday, Rihanna showed off her new henna-inspired tattoo on her right hand that covered up most of the traditional art work she got in New Zealand
Before and after: Tattoo artist Keith McCurdy says he thinks he made her tribal art work 'pretty'
Before and after: Tattoo artist Keith McCurdy says he thinks he made her tribal art work 'pretty'

She can't stop: It took 11 hours to add to her old designs, and she was left 'bruised,' according to her artist
She can't stop: It took 11 hours to add to her old designs, and she was left 'bruised,' according to her artist

NEW ZEALANDER TATTOO ARTIST DEFENDS RIHANNA AFTER BACKLASH

Rihanna has been slammed on Twitter for modifying her traditional tribal ink.
Purple Kisses said, 'Far too much going on' and They Call Me Sir! said the decision was 'horrifying.'

Tiki Taane, who was one of Rihanna's New Zealand tattooists, has come out to defend the singer.

'I love how she’s pulling together all these different cultures through tattooing, that’s mean alright!' he wrote on his page.

'I think the added tattooing looks awesome! It pulls the traditional work in nicely. Go Riri i say. I know what its like traveling the world getting tattooed & its always a massive work in progress. Ive had 43 tattooist from around the planet work on me & im still along way off finishing it all. Choice one!'
Her artists Keith McCurdy and Cally Jo - who have tatted up Rihanna's pals Katy Perry and Justin Bieber - work out of Bang Bang Tattoo in New York City's Lower East Side.

'We designed something that plays over the knuckles and wrist, and just tried to incorporate it with what was done before,' Keith told Page Six.
'We blended what used to be there into a more decorative pattern. We tried to make it look like jewelry, a bit like a henna tattoo.'
Happy at last: Keith McCurdy said the Grammy winner 'loved' her new tattoos
Happy at last: Keith McCurdy said the Grammy winner 'loved' her new tattoos
An obsession?: The Barbados beauty has several other designs on her body, like a gun on her side
An obsession?: The Barbados beauty has several other designs on her body, like a gun on her side

Does she want more? The Chris Brown ex has about 20 tattoos already
Does she want more? The Chris Brown ex has about 20 tattoos already

RIHANNA'S TOP TATTOOS

1. Egyptian queen Nefertiti
2. Hand gun
3. Skull
4. Dragon claw
5. 'Love'
6. 'Shhh...'
7. Pisces sign
8. Stars
9. Goddess Isis
10. XI IV LXXXVI
Keith added the 25-year-old was 'bruised' from the session on Sunday, but was 'fine.'
'We drew on her hand from 7 pm to midnight. We were drawing and changing things,' Keith told E!
'I'd take a break and Cally-Jo would draw, then I'd draw ... The inspiration was henna art, we wanted something really decorative, feminine and sexy. We thought that was the closest in style where we could shift and make it look decorative.
'She had something pre-existing on her hand. So it was a little bit of a cover up, but also making it look good, wanted to make sure it flowed. We needed to work with what she already had. [It was] difficult, because the stuff she already had was a pattern on skin. We were trying to fit the body with what she already had. Mend the two styles with a new style.'
Rihanna 'flipped out! Absolutely loved it, loved it!' the artist also told E!
He also commented on a before and after Instagram photo of the hand, 'So proud we made it pretty??'
Hardcore! Rihanna had a traditional Maori tattoo inked onto her arm with a chisel and mallet during her trip to New Zealand this week
Hardcore! She had a traditional Maori tattoo inked onto her arm with a chisel and mallet during her trip to New Zealand
Struggling: The intricate design featured lines and symbols going from the top of Rihanna's fingers down to the middle of her forearm
Struggling: The intricate design featured lines and symbols going from the top of Rihanna's fingers down to the middle of her forearm
Struggling: The intricate design featured lines and symbols going from the top of Rihanna's fingers down to the middle of her forearm
Read More »

Best friends, all four live in the same cul-de-sac. And they ALL found out their husbands were cheating on them

They met in a quiet Cardiff cul-de-sac as they embarked on married lives, babysat each other's children and laughed together on Friday nights.
But two decades later, Jan, Sarah, Jackie and Alison have more in common than just neighbourly bonds because, incredibly, within a year, all four discovered their husbands were having affairs. Here, they describe the very different ways they dealt with infidelity, and pay tribute to the friends who proved their salvation.
Scorned: They met in a quiet Cardiff cul-de-sac as they embarked on married lives, but two decades later, all four discovered their husbands were having affairs
Scorned: They met in a quiet Cardiff cul-de-sac as they embarked on married lives, but two decades later, all four discovered their husbands were having affairs

I FORGAVE MY HUSBAND THREE AFFAIRS

Jan Griffiths, 47, is mother to Aiden, 30, Lucy, 18, and Josh, 13. She married her husband Stephen, 47, an entrepreneur, in March 1992. Stephen has had three affairs - the last of which was in October 2010 - but they remain married.
As I opened the letter, my jaw dropped in disbelief. 'Dear Jan,' it started. 'I have to tell you I've been having an affair with your husband for the past 11 months . . .'

The woman explained she was a local bar manager and that she was in love with Stephen. She also left her contact details.
Until that moment in 1997 I'd had no reason to question Stephen's fidelity - in the five years we'd been married he'd always seemed so dependable.
Cheating husband: Jan Griffiths forgave her husband's three affairs, though she doesn't fully trust him again
Cheating husband: Jan Griffiths forgave her husband's three affairs, though she doesn't fully trust him again

Stunned, I called my friend Sarah for advice. She had been living in the same cul-de-sac for two years and we'd become soul mates. Our great friend Alison had arrived in 1993 and Jackie, like Sarah, came along in 1995. Sarah reassured me that Stephen would never cheat. But I was determined to discover the truth, so I drove to his office, taking her for support.
Stephen was horrified when I walked in and flung the letter on his desk. He muttered that he'd only seen this woman once or twice. I stormed out, furious. Sarah's rage almost matched my own.
Over the next week, the atmosphere at home was terrible, as Stephen steadfastly refused to talk about what had happened. Desperate, I decided the only way to discover the truth was to meet the woman myself.
I arranged to meet her for coffee. With short blonde hair and an average figure, aged about 37, she wasn't even more attractive than me. By the time we finished our coffee I felt sorry for her. She was infatuated, but Stephen had told her he had no intention of leaving me.
When, days later, Stephen eventually confessed to the affair, he insisted he loved me, and that it had been a harmless flirtation which had led to a situation he couldn't get out of.
I tried to forgive but, as the months went by, I found it impossible to trust him.
While the 'girls' were very supportive and urged me to stick by him, it was hard being the only one with a cheating husband. They all appeared to have marriages that, if not perfect, were healthier. Eventually, a year later, Stephen and I went for counselling. It emerged he felt that not only had I become engrossed with the children, but I'd dominated our relationship. His affair had been his way of asserting himself.
Slowly I learned to trust him again: I felt the crisis had strengthened our marriage. So I was livid when, in October 2006, I heard him in the conservatory whispering to another woman on the phone at 2am.
I snatched the mobile - one I'd never seen before - from his hand. The line went dead and I stormed off, hiding his secret phone in my handbag.
The next morning, his mistress called and I answered. I learned she'd met Stephen when he was on a golfing weekend in Ireland nine months earlier and had no idea he was married. When I confronted him later, he insisted: 'Nothing happened. We just talked to each other.'
We stayed up all night arguing. He'd betrayed me again!


'I was livid when, in October 2006, I heard him in the conservatory whispering to another woman on the phone at 2am.'

Despite my rage, by 6am I decided I didn't want to leave. Stephen was still a wonderful father, and I have to be honest about the fact that I didn't want to jeopardise our comfortable lifestyle. But the damage was done and our physical relationship disappeared overnight.
'I didn't worry that the lack of it would make Stephen stray: after all, he'd proved he could cheat even when we'd had a healthy sex life.
When the girls from the cul-de-sac got together on Friday nights for cocktails, they were respectful of my decision and careful not to judge.
Then, in November 2010, I found yet another strange mobile phone, tucked in a seat pocket in our car. On it were dozens of flirtatious text messages to yet another woman.
I confronted Stephen immediately. He admitted he'd met her on another golfing trip a month earlier.
'She means nothing . . . nothing happened,' he insisted. 'I love you.'
I didn't know what to do. He insisted that, like the time before, nothing physical had happened. But should I stand by him or throw him out?
Jan and Stephen's wedding day: While the couple are still together, Jan has set up Women Scorned, a support website for cheated wives who can't afford expensive therapy
Jan and Stephen's wedding day: While the couple are still together, Jan has set up Women Scorned, a support website for cheated wives who can't afford expensive therapy

When I asked the girls, Jackie pointed out the positives. Unlike her husband, Stephen was attentive and funny, and she reminded me how happy we'd been.
But in February, unable to bear the betrayal any longer, I snapped and told him: 'I want a divorce.'
Stephen's reaction shocked me. He started to cry and seemed so genuinely sorry that I knew I couldn't leave. But I warned him I would not tolerate any more infidelities.
It's been three years now. I'd be lying if I said I fully trusted Stephen, but when I see him playing with our youngest son, I'm so glad I gave him another chance.
Unfortunately, the same can't be said for Jackie, Sarah and Alison, because over the next eight months they would all find themselves alone after their own husbands cheated.
It was their ordeals that inspired me to set up Women Scorned, a support website for cheated wives who can't afford expensive therapy. As I know all too well, the support of friends is worth any number of counselling sessions.    
Sarah Roberts: 'My whole life felt like a lie'
Sarah Roberts: 'My whole life felt like a lie'

I HAD A BREAKDOWN

Sarah Roberts, 42, married Lloyd, 43, in July 1991. They have three daughters: Jenny, 20, Felicity, 15, and Ruth, six. Lloyd, a manager at an electricity board, left her in July 2011. Sarah still lives in Cardiff, as do Lloyd and his new partner.  
When Stephen betrayed Jan, I felt so sorry for her, but never expected in a million years that Lloyd would do the same to me.
My husband and I met at a party in 1986 and had a fairytale wedding in 1991. Four years later we moved into a three-bedroom end-of-terrace in Jan's cul-de-sac.
It was a great place to bring up a young family and as our children grew up, we bonded over play-dates and milestones like their first days at school. Meanwhile, Lloyd was the perfect father and husband. I adored him.
Then, four years ago, he suddenly took up running and bought a motorbike.
I put his odd behaviour down to a mid-life crisis. After all, I thought, we still told each other everything and we had a healthy sex life.
So I was stunned when an anonymous letter arrived in January 2011, claiming Lloyd had been caught in a romantic clinch with a colleague.
'This letter has also been sent to Lloyd's boss and his married colleague's husband,' it stated. 'You need to be aware of what's going on.'
That night Lloyd denied everything, saying it was a cruel prank and he loved me. I believed him.
For the next seven months, we carried on as normal, our sex life remaining as good as ever. We even made love the night before he left me.
It was July 2011, the week before our 20th wedding anniversary.
That morning Lloyd asked me to do a supermarket shop. But when I got back, he announced: 'I don't want to be married to you any more.'
I fell to the floor and just howled.
I could see his belongings in his car: he'd clearly sent me out so he could pack his things. He insisted before driving off that he wasn't seeing another woman.
Where had the devoted man I loved disappeared to? My whole life felt like a lie.
A few days later, I took a razor to my wrists. I wanted to end it all.
My eldest daughter found me and my sister drove me to hospital, where I was diagnosed with an emotional breakdown. For the next six weeks, I stayed at a mental health unit.
Fairytale wedding: The week before their 20th wedding anniversary, Lloyd left Sarah
Fairytale wedding: The week before their 20th wedding anniversary, Lloyd left Sarah

The girls from the cul-de-sac were amazing. Jan, recently betrayed herself and doubly supportive, took me for walks and made cakes for my daughters. We spent evenings watching Steel Magnolias - our favourite film. Here we were, two women whose husbands had abused our trust.
In December 2011, Lloyd and his colleague made their relationship official, though others have since told me they'd been together for around a year.
Later that month, I filed for divorce.
Lloyd's new relationship was a blow, but my girlfriends wouldn't let me crumble again. They listened patiently as I ranted.
I hope one day I will be able to laugh again. If anyone can put a smile on my face, these girls can.
Jackie Powell: 'We grew more distant, but I never suspected he was cheating'
Jackie Powell: 'We grew more distant, but I never suspected he was cheating'

I started dating

Jackie Powell, 52, married Paul, a university lecturer, in April 1992. They have two children: James, 20, and Amelia, 19. In April 2010, Paul, 59, left Jackie for a Mexican woman whom he married in May 2011. They now live in Mexico City. Jackie still lives in Cardiff.  
As much as I love my friends, sometimes I feel our cul-de-sac was cursed.  
Paul and I moved into our detached four-bedroom house in 1995 after he took a post at the University of Wales. We'd met in 1991 when I was a mature student and he was my psychology lecturer. By the time we married, I was already five weeks pregnant and had abandoned my university place.
As a stay-at-home mother, I quickly built a rapport with the other mums in the cul-de-sac. We took it in turns to host New Year's Eve parties and spent many evenings gossiping when the children were in bed.
Meanwhile, at home Paul chipped away at my confidence. He'd accuse me of not cleaning our house properly or criticise my hair.
Still, when Jan confided about her husband's affairs, while I felt sympathy, part of me was relieved that at least I hadn't had to go through that.
Paul, meanwhile, thought my girlfriends were beneath him: 'They're a waste of space,' he said.
He never elaborated, but I knew it was because they weren't as educated as him.
In 2005 Paul took up Spanish, claiming it would help his career. By 2008 he was going abroad regularly to forge 'good relations' with other universities.
We grew more distant, but I never suspected he was cheating.

So I was shocked when, at Easter 2010, Paul announced it wasn't working between us and he was going  to Mexico to stay with a lecturer called Alma.
When I told my friends, Jan advised me to get myself a good solicitor. I thought it was too soon, but she was right: two weeks later Paul returned and told me he wanted a divorce.
'Get the rat to move out,' insisted Jan when I called her in tears. But, fearing I'd be judged a failure if he left, I moved into the spare room instead. A month later I was served with divorce papers while Paul was at work.
That evening, he admitted he was in a 'growing relationship' with Alma.
Jackie's wedding, 1992: Jackie has started seeing someone else but she's devastated she couldn't make her marriage last
Jackie's wedding, 1992: Jackie has started seeing someone else but she's devastated she couldn't make her marriage last

Our divorce was finalised in January 2011, but he still refused to leave the family home. Then, the following month, I found an invitation to his wedding in his bedside table. It was to be in Mexico City that May.
I felt sick as I called Jan. She came straight over and told me I deserved more. Later that week, Sarah took me to a bar to cheer me up.
While they couldn't take away my pain, just having my friends, who had been in the same boat, on my side made me feel better.
Finally, Paul agreed to let me have our £195,000 home and moved out a month after marrying Alma. Last July, he retired and moved to Mexico. The children have visited once.
While I haven't had a serious romance since, for the past two years I have been seeing someone. It's a casual relationship based on friendship: I still find it hard to trust. I'm devastated I couldn't make my marriage last. Having given up my degree and ambitions for Paul, I sacrificed so much. So I hope it works out for him - otherwise, all the hurt will have been for nothing.

I WANTED TO KEEP MY TUNISIAN TOYBOY

Alison: 'I logged onto his email and discovered a string of messages from a German girl'
Alison: 'I logged onto his email and discovered a string of messages from a German girl'

Alison Morris, 52, married Aymen, 32, a Tunisian waiter, in May 2010. They divorced in May 2012 after she claimed Aymen had been flirting with other women. Alison lives alone in Cardiff.
The first friend I made when I moved into the cul-de-sac was Jan. It was 1993 and I'd just bought a two-bedroom semi five doors down from her. We bonded over coffee and I loved her honesty. She was a kindred spirit.
When she confided about her husband's affairs, I admired the way she stuck to her guns when the obvious thing would have been to throw Stephen out. She never minced her words.
While I'd had a partner for 19 years, we broke up in 2009.
When I fell for a gorgeous man 20 years my junior on holiday shortly afterwards, I remember Jan saying: 'Don't give him any money.'
Aymen and I met in the restaurant where he worked on the first evening of my Tunisian break.
With his cheeky smile, I was thrilled when he invited me for coffee. We kissed, we watched the stars from his rooftop and we became inseparable. The day after I flew home, he texted saying he missed me.
Part of me knew a relationship was a ridiculous idea, but I found his attention irresistible.
I visited him in October and again in December. The following month he told me his flatmate had moved out and he couldn't afford the rent on his own. Would I transfer £200?
I agreed, but didn't tell the girls as I knew they would think I was naive.
After that, I was giving him at least £200 every month, even though I couldn't afford it.
I began going to Tunisia regularly and in April 2010 Aymen proposed.
I accepted. My former partner had just got engaged and I wanted to prove I was desirable, too.
The girls thought I was mad. 'You barely know him,' said Jackie. 'Have you lost your mind?'
But I loved feeling wanted. We married in Tunisia on May 6, 2010.
Aymen didn't want to leave Tunisia and, as my mother's carer, I couldn't leave Cardiff, but I visited him often.
But soon after we married, I found a perfume bottle in his bathroom and a pair of earrings under his bed. He insisted they belonged to his friend's girlfriend and I wanted to believe him.
But by the summer of 2011 I was increasingly suspicious. During a visit that September, I logged onto his email and discovered a string of messages from a German girl. There were other flirtatious emails to Polish and Russian girls.
'When I confronted him about the emails, he shrugged'
'When I confronted him about the emails, he shrugged'

When I confronted him, he shrugged and said: 'You're always accusing me of being with other women anyway.'
The girls here were so sympathetic, but then they all knew what it was like to be cheated on. Jackie even offered to fly to Tunisia with me to help me sort things out. I felt stupid but didn't want to admit defeat.
Then, the day after I got back from a visit in January 2012, Aymen rang and said he wanted a divorce. I later found out that he had a new Tunisian girlfriend.
I couldn't face going to the divorce hearing, but as far as I'm aware I'm now divorced, although I still haven't received my papers.
Thankfully, I have not been asked to pay him any more money. I wasted thousands of pounds on a man who only ever wanted me for cash and I'm a fool for not realising it sooner.
But the best thing about the girls? They never once said: 'I told you so.' After all, we've all had our hearts broken in different ways.
Some names have been changed. For the support website for cheated wives that Jan set up, visit  women-scorned.co.uk.
Read More »

Terrorised by union bullies: How Labour's Unite paymasters intimidated managers and their children in bitter oil refinery battle

The full extent of the Unite union’s campaign of bullying and intimidation against senior managers during the bitter Grangemouth oil refinery dispute is revealed today.
In a disturbing echo of the union militancy of the 1970s and 80s, Unite leaders deployed a dirty tricks squad to personally target and humiliate executives of the Ineos chemical company and their families.
The sinister unit – known as the ‘Leverage team’ – sent mobs of protesters to the homes of senior figures in the firm.
One director last night said he had feared for the safety of his wife and his two young children after 30 Unite protesters descended on his drive during the school holidays.
The Unite union bullied and intimidated senior managers during the bitter Grangemouth oil refinery dispute
The Unite union bullied and intimidated senior managers during the bitter Grangemouth oil refinery dispute

Police were called after the group approached his neighbours, telling them he was ‘evil’ in an apparent attempt to coerce him into giving in to their demands.
The daughter of another company boss had ‘Wanted’ posters denouncing her father posted through her front door hundreds of miles away in Hampshire.
The union agreed to call off the Leverage team only as part of the settlement of  the dispute.
Yesterday, an unrepentant Unite spokesman said such activities were ‘legitimate in the context of an industrial dispute’, adding that ‘bad employers should have nowhere to hide’.
Stephen Deans, the Unite organiser at the heart of the dispute
Stephen Deans, the Unite organiser at the heart of the dispute

Details of the bully-boy tactics were revealed yesterday as David Cameron branded Stephen Deans, the Unite organiser at the heart of the dispute, a ‘rogue trade unionist’ whose behaviour nearly sank the plant.
Ineos threatened to close the Grangemouth plant after Mr Deans and Unite refused a new pay and pension package designed to save the business.
Unite general secretary Len McCluskey brought the dispute to crisis point by launching strike action.
Unite finally caved in last Friday and Mr Deans resigned on Monday after being told he would be fired for spending a quarter of his working hours on Labour party business. Mr Deans was also chairman of the Falkirk Labour party where he had become embroiled in a Labour vote-rigging scandal.
The Prime Minister said of Mr Deans: ‘Frankly, we have a real problem with a rogue trade unionist at Grangemouth who nearly brought the Scottish petrochemical industry to its knees.’
One Grangemouth boss, who as asked not to be named for fear of reprisals, called the police after 25 Unite members working for the union’s Leverage team protested on his driveway with flags, banners and an inflatable rat for about 90 minutes on October 18.
The director was called by his wife, who was out with her children and had been phoned by a friend to say a mob had arrived on their doorstep. He rushed to the scene said he was overcome with ‘bloody anger’ when he saw they had targeted him.
‘It was a mob, a threatening mob,’ he said. Children as young as seven who were playing on the street were coaxed into joining the mob.
‘They were trying to humiliate me,’ the director said. ‘Trying to portray me as a nasty boss, a nasty capitalist. To portray me as someone evil. Their intent was to have my neighbours thinking, gosh, what sort of a guy do we have living there.
Unite members protest outside the home of an Ineos director over the Grangemouth dispute
Unite members protest outside the home of an Ineos director over the Grangemouth dispute
‘It was just despicable to approach kids and try to introduce them to a demonstration against one of their neighbours. It’s hard to find words to describe the lunacy of their behaviour.’
Police were called and interviewed the director and his neighbours at length, saying they would search out the members of the group on suspicion of being in breach of the peace. Officers decided not to press charges.

The director added: ‘Their intent was to gain concessions. But taking it to someone’s home, to someone’s drive, during the school holidays, is way over the line.’

LEVERAGE IS LEGITIMATE, SAYS UNION

Unite admit the use of ‘Leverage’ on their website and claim it has helped secure a number of ‘landmark victories’.
It says: ‘Leverage is a process whereby the union commits resources and time to making all interested parties aware of the treatment received by Unite members at the hands of an employer.
‘Those interested parties may include shareholders of the employer; competitors of the employer; communities within which the employer operates; customers of the employer and the market place of the employer.
‘We ask all interested parties to make moral and ethical decisions about their future relations with an employer who we believe is acting immorally.
‘Unite will make sure all are aware of the true facts behind an employer’s poor treatment of our members.
‘We will ask those who object to the behaviour of an immoral employer to conduct in lawful protest against the actions of the employer.
‘Where Unite members are involved in such lawful protest the union will use  its best endeavours to ensure such  members are aware of their rights of  lawful protest. Leverage is not a call for unofficial action.
‘Leverage is about the democratic right of the union to ensure that immoral employers cannot hide behind veils of secrecy and must conduct their business in an open and transparent fashion and accept the consequences of the moral judgements that may follow.
‘It is in no way a replacement for  collective strength. The development of industrial power remains vital if workers are to have the ability to win long-term.
‘Leverage does not offer a solution that excludes the critical need to organise workers.
‘Leverage has secured landmark  victories including:
‘Honda – defeat of de-recognition at the CAC.
‘BESNA – defeat of the so-called BESNA 7 – construction industry ‘majors’ – who were seeking to rip up industry agreements and impose inferior contracts on thousands of workers.
‘London Buses – a supplementary payment gained following a dispute over additional workload caused by London’s hosting of the Olympics.’
The director and his wife now fear for the safety of their children, who are both under ten.
‘It had quite an impact on my kids,’ he said. ‘My wife is very concerned that they could turn up at any time again. They know where I live. It’s in the back of my mind.’
Leaflets denouncing company owner Jim Ratcliffe were also posted through the doors of homes in the town where he lives.
Union protests were also held outside dozens of businesses which trade with Ineos, including their bankers Lloyds and customers Sainsbury’s and Asda, in a effort to pressurise them to cut their ties with the firm.
Another Ineos director said: ‘They have send flying squads of protesters to dozens of businesses we have links with. The put leaflets through the door of pretty much every house in Lyndhurst where we have our headquarters. My daughter received a poster explaining what a terrible person I am.
‘This behaviour smacks of totalitarianism. The way they have been behaving is frankly insane.’
The Mail has seen an email, sent from Mr Deans’ email account last Wednesday, acknowledging that the Leverage unit went on the attack.
The message, written by Mr Deans’ fellow Unite convenor Mark Lyons to Calum MacLean and Declan Sealy, the two Ineos negotiators, offered the company a deal. In addition to accepting the ‘survival plan’ and ‘pensions proposals’, the Unite point man also says union bosses will ‘ensure withdrawal of leverage strategy’.
On Unite’s website, the union boasts that it uses ‘leverage’ to put pressure on ‘shareholders of the employer, competitors of the employer, communities within which the employer operates’ and ‘customers of the employer’.
‘Leverage is about the democratic right of the Union to ensure that immoral employers cannot hide behind veils of secrecy.’
The behaviour of the Leverage team appears not to violate union laws banning secondary picketing since protests are allowed if they do not prevent employers of the firms they targeted from going to work.
But the Tories last night branded the revelations ‘extremely sinister’ and called on Ed Milibad to reopen Labour’s inquiry into the activities of Unite.
A Unite spokesman said: ‘All the activities referred to are both legal and legitimate in the context of an industrial dispute. Bad employers should have nowhere to hide.
‘Of course all campaigning in the context of the Ineos dispute has now ended.
‘However for the workers and their union to be described as “bullies” is beyond satire.’
Last night Len McCluskey denounced Mr Cameron after he used Prime Minister’s Question Time to criticise Mr Deans.
‘The Prime Minister’s conduct today was disgraceful,’ said Mr McCluskey. ‘His rush to smear a good and honourable man will appal decent-thinking people. He should apologise at once.’
Read More »

Follow Me